Product
Resources
Computer-based testing
Set papers against your own syllabus, enter candidates at their centres, run the exam in a locked-down app, mark it, and publish the results. When someone asks why a candidate scored 47, the answer is on a screen.
Anyone who sets a paper, sits candidates and has to stand behind the result afterwards.
Run your diets against your own syllabus, with exemptions, credits and a results sheet your council can defend.
Sit thousands of candidates on the same paper, on the same day, across every centre you operate.
Screening tests, semester exams and resits, marked and published without collecting a single paper script.
Entrance exams and mock papers, with each candidate's full history held under one registration number.
Recruitment and promotion exams, with a record of who sat, who supervised and who published.
Aptitude tests and certification exams, run at your centres or at a candidate's own machine.
Built for examining bodies, not adapted from a course platform. A sitting holds papers, candidates write them at centres, and no course or enrolment is involved anywhere.
Registrars, invigilators and examiners each get the screens their role needs. An invigilator who covers one centre sees that centre. The portal runs in seven languages.
Eight stages, in the order they happen. Each one is a screen in the portal.
Add your qualifications, faculties, levels and subjects. Record exemptions and credits against a candidate, so nobody sits a paper they already hold.
Write a paper in the editor, in sections, marking questions compulsory where your rules require it. Save questions to a bank, import them in bulk, and pull a set into a later paper.
A registrant is a person, and keeps one registration number for life. A candidate is that person at one sitting. Each candidate record lists every paper the person has written, at any centre.
Group the papers into one sitting period, which your institute may call a diet, and give each paper its own date, duration and reading time. Then enter candidates for the papers they are taking.
Candidates write in a locked-down app, let in by an access code that works once, on one machine. Assign invigilators per paper, and limit them to a single centre when that is all they supervise.
One board shows who is writing, who has finished, who has not started, and what the app has flagged. Grant extra time where a candidate is entitled to it, and the record keeps who granted it.
Mark written answers question by question, and the record keeps who marked each script. Read one paper on its own, or the results sheet for the whole sitting, then publish it with a version and a checksum.
Take appeals against a published result. See which question everyone got wrong, send the figures to your board, and show the history behind any mark that changed.
Two different things, worth keeping apart. One is what the app prevents while a candidate is writing. The other is what it tells the invigilator.
The app records what happened and when. It does not record video, and it stores no image of a candidate. A signal tells an invigilator to go and look. It decides nothing, and nothing is labelled suspicious on a candidate's behalf.
Results get challenged long after the hall is empty. Everything below is part of the published document, so someone who was not there can still read what happened.
The quickest way to judge this is with a paper you have already sat. Bring one, and we will run it through from syllabus to published results.